Leaders’ Post-Elections Speech Ratings

First, allow me to apologise in advance for writing about politics on this blog but while my passion is hockey (and hunting), I do have a section on the blog that I call Slice of Life, a whole section in which I write about everything and anything that comes to mind that’s not hockey related. Granted, it’s not my main focus but it’s one that I will start developing more as I realise that in life, there’s so much more than hockey and that, as much as I love the game.

Yesterday was Elections day in Canada and voting, even if we don’t think will make a difference, is very important. It’s a privilege that we have by living in a country where soldiers fought for our freedom and our rights to a democratic society. You see, we have a choice, we have a voice, and even on this blog, I encouraged everyone to go out and vote, particularly younger people. And the people of Canada have spoken: our next government will be a Liberal minority government with the Conservatives as official opposition. Quebec has also spoken loud and clear by bringing back the Bloc Quebecois from the dead.

I will leave the detailed analysis to political experts, which I certainly am not. But what struck me as a Canadian last night, were the speeches of every party leader. Most of them were humble, positive, and all but one was respectful of their opposition. All but Conservative leader Andrew Scheer, but we’ll get back to it. First, let’s listen to Yves-François Blanchet of the Bloc Quebecois:

Humble yet clear that he will be serving the people who gave him a clear mandate. Respectful of other parties nonetheless. No BS in this speech.

Now, the speech that impressed me the most, personally. See, I have never stopped to listen to NDP’s leader Jagmeet Singh speak before last night and I was shocked to hear how poised, genuine and respectful of a man he is. He shocked me when he broke into French too. The late Jack Layton, the last politician to truly “speak to me”, would have been proud of that speech:

Now our Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, with the same speech he’s been giving, and pardon me to say that it’s the same lip-service he gave four years ago, breaking hundreds of electoral promises after that. Will this time be different under a minority? Time will tell. But here’s what Mr. Trudeau had to say:

Last but not least, Andrew Scheer and the Conservatives, who have won the West single-handedly. Notice the difference in the tone and what he says, compared to the previous three:

Attacks, sour grapes, like a kid who didn’t get his way. Mr. Scheer if I may… yes, you won the popular vote but only because you had most of the votes out West. Don’t fool yourself. Anyone with a solid platform would have taken advantage of a Trudeau who, let’s face it, had basically knocked himself out with the SNC Lavalin lies, the blocking of the RCMP investigation, the Phoenix payroll fiasco, the “outfit outrage” on his trip to India, the “black man” Halloween picture, his loosy-goosy immigration and many other blunders.

All you had to do, Mr. Scheer, was to come up with a political platform that would cater to the Maritimes, Quebec and Ontario as you already had the West in your back pocket. Instead, you chose to keep putting down a Trudeau who was already down, and rally your own troops out west. And you continued making the same mistake in your post-elections’ speech. This was YOUR elections to lose and you did a fantastic job at it. Instead of accepting defeat with grace, you did what no other leader has done: continued your attacks. People in Canada have taken notice and that, no matter what party they’ve supported in this election. In a world where you need to get more voters outside the Conservative contingency, you have pushed potential supporters away… again. The Liberal didn’t win those elections as much as you’ve handed them the win on a silver platter.

Rant over folks. Elections are over and it’s time to get back to hockey (and hunting). We have a Government. Did I “lose” my elections? No. Did I “win” my elections? Not based on the party that was elected but yes, I won my elections by having exercised my right to vote. The people of Canada have spoken and I beg you follow my lead by putting your political differences aside and return to being CanadiAns… and cheer on our CanadiEns! Go Habs Go!


Beyond Politics is a Habs’ Reality


A never ending topic, a discussion coming back to the table periodically, is the one about the need for a bilingual coach and for the number of players from Quebec with the Canadiens. Back when they won Stanley Cups, the Quebecois contingent was always strong and many were important contributors. Of course, the beloved Habs are fortunate enough to have the most diversified fan base on the planet and in Canada, where you stand on the topic is, more often than not, based on the primary language that you speak, with little to no respect or understanding towards the other side’s wants and needs.

This year, the Canadiens started the season with only two local products in their ranks: David Desharnais and Torrey Mitchell. We have to thank the injury to Tom Gilbert to have a third one when Mark Barberio was called up. We all know the story of how Desharnais is the scape goat of many fans and media members, particularly in the Anglophone portion of the fan base, and Mitchell and Barberio are escaping the blunt of the crowd. Ironically, only one has a French name…

But why is this happening? A few years ago, some “influent” people met at a summit on hockey to discuss the topic. It is a fact that the QMJHL didn’t seem to be competitive at the Memorial Cup, and that there has been a decline in the number of players from the “Q” being drafted for several years now, an issue that Gilles Courteau doesn’t take lightly, and neither is Hockey Quebec. It is also true that there are fewer and fewer Quebecois in the NHL but the teams who have them seem to appreciate being able to count on them. Whether it’s Luongo, Burrows, Perron, Després, Duclair, Vermette, Bergeron, Talbot, Deslaurier, Danault, Beauchemin, Tanguay, Savard, Demers, Huberdeau, Lecavalier, Scandella, Ribeiro, G. Bourque, Gélinas, Brassard, Pageau, Chiasson, Letang, Fleury, Vlasic, Marchessault, Paquette, Parenteau, Perreault and even Drouin (3rd overall pick), we’re talking about players contributing to their team’s success!

But why this phenomena?

Is it due to the economy? Is it because kids now days have so many other choices of sports? The economy and the choices are similar in other provinces, and those provinces don’t seem to suffer as much, at least not when looking at Team Canada Junior’s overall success and at at the number of players drafted from the WHL and OHL. Unfortunately, some prefer crying discrimination, choosing to blame others instead of facing the problem by looking in the mirror.

I have my theory… Several years ago, Canada went through a dry spell at the international level and Hockey Canada searched for answers and reasons. Seeing the level of skills in Europe, they looked in the mirror and realized that not enough time was spent on developing skills and too much time was allocated for games. They also recognized that in order to develop those players, coaches have to be qualified. That’s when they implemented the Program of Excellence, which Wayne Gretzky (amongst others) was part of. If someone wants to coach minor hockey in Canada, they need to take some extensive coaching clinics and the suggested ratio practice to game has since been increased to four practices for every game played!

Someone told me a few years back that Hockey Quebec didn’t want to follow suit, preferring to keep the status quo without Hockey Canada’s help. We saw them eventually change their mind, some 20 years later than the rest of Canada, and scramble to catch up, looking for solutions, by creating summits of their own. It goes to show that sometimes, one can learn just as much relying on others’ experience instead of waiting to experience it themselves, while being just as efficient and mostly, learning quicker.

How can the Canadiens help?kids

Even living in British-Columbia some 4,000 kilometres away, I can recognize the importance and even the need to have players from Quebec playing for the Montreal Canadiens.

You see, Montreal is different than any other NHL city if only from the fact of the language spoken and that, whether fans want to agree with it or not. Yes, many in Quebec (especially in Montreal) are bilingual but a vast majority in the rest of the province, including children, don’t understand English. They do want to be able to not only understand, but relate to the players, to have some sort of connection with them, with the team.

It is just as important when looking at marketing, as all 82 Habs’ games are televised on TVA Sports and RDS (French station, French commercials for French speaking people), as well as for corporate boxes at the Bell Centre when the majority of the investors are French and do business in Quebec, in French, not counting the publicity sold by the organization in and out of the rink.

As for the attachment and commitment to French speaking Quebecois, it’s nothing new as if we go back in history, going all the way back to the conception of the Montreal Canadiens, to the root of the team, it was created in the mind set of creating a rivalry, having a team of French players, playing against the English, the Maroons.

Later on, Maurice Richard was not only a great player but foremost, he was the idol of a nation, Quebec, a symbol standing tall against the English, an ordinary guy from home, a neighbour who was the best in a sport that we loved, playing for the Montreal Canadiens! And it was a similar feeling towards Jean Beliveau and Guy Lafleur after him.

I remember about 45 years ago when I started playing hockey and growing up through the minor hockey systems in Sherbrooke, I had the privilege of being able to associate myself, to relate to players like Yvan Cournoyer, Jacques Lemaire, Serge Savard, Guy Lapointe, Guy Lafleur, Yvon Lambert and Mario Tremblay amongst others, players who gave me the hope of a dream… I did not speak or understand a single word of English. If you were to ask the younger ones, they would tell you that they lived similar situations by looking up to Patrick Roy, Guy Carbonneau, Claude Lemieux, Stéphane Richer, Vincent Damphousse, Pierre Turgeon and Eric Desjardins… If those players from my neighbourhood, who speak my language, can make it big, why can’t I dream of doing the same, was I thinking to myself?Lafleur

You see, it’s more than admiring hockey players. But as young boys playing hockey (or liking the sport) and as a Habs’ fan, it was a motivation, an example that young boys from Quebec can succeed, achieve their dream of one day, wearing the red, white and blue and have their turn at being idolized, admired by young hockey players as they did themselves.

And the support

Having said that, with everything that has happened in recent years, it is evident that one needs a particular personality to succeed in Montreal as in today’s NHL, they fill your pockets with money at the very beginning of your career, you are recognized everywhere in town, puck-bunnies and all, and everything that comes with what I call “vedettaria”, an illness which swells the head of its victims, giving them the impression that they’re bigger than what they really are. It looks like the only cure is to send them to another city by trading them, which has for effect to take down the swelling and bring back the work ethics that saw them get the success that brought them to the NHL to start with. According to some, Guillaume Latendresse and Maxim Lapierre are the most recent ones to have suffered from it but we find other similar cases over the years, guys like Mike Ribeiro, José Theodore and Pierre Dagenais amongst others…

While we can point fingers to players from Quebec, it seems like every young player coming to play in Montreal is subject to it. We saw guys like Higgins, the Kostitsyn brothers and Price falling to it, with some recovering on time it seems and we’re hearing similar stories about Alex Galchenyuk today. That’s why it’s crucial to find great veterans to mentor those young players, to teach them the ropes, what to avoid and teach them how to become true professionals on and off the ice.

In spite of what some may think, it is very important to have local players (from Quebec) on the Montreal Canadiens’ roster but even more important is the selection of those players as well of how they are supported. You need to have a certain quality, a define personality to succeed in Montreal and it’s even more true when it comes to local players.

Don’t people remember the fiasco surrounding the Randy Conneyworth interm coach promotion? Even the owner, Geoff Molson, recognizes the need for it. Thankfully, Habs’ GM Marc Bergevin also recognizes the need.

So if you think that by trying to justify your need to put down locals behind the team’s performances, you will change simply by getting rid of the French speaking coach or players, you are fooling yourself but you are not fooling those who have been following this team long enough. Pierre Turgeon, Vincent Damphousse, Guy Carbonneau (the player), even Lafleur were chased out of town. So were Alain Vigneault, Claude Julien, Guy Carbonneau (the coach) and Michel Therrien the first time. Now you want Desharnais and Therrien gone again? If history has proven one and one only thing, it’s that you won’t be satisfied with the next French speaking guys either. Do some soul searching and for everyone having to listen and read your constant complaints, give it a rest.

Go Habs Go!!!