A Divisive Fan Base

BadvsGoodHabs

Human beings come in all forms, with many different backgrounds, upbringing, experiences and mindsets. You can have five people looking at the exact same thing and you’ll have five different descriptions of what they’re looking at. And there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that as society has evolved and items were invented because of this diversion of thoughts… unless it’s combined with narcism, egocentricity or the need to be right at all cost.

Fans of sports’ teams are no different. They are human beings who will have different levels of involvements and interest in their favourite team. In Montreal, fans of the Canadiens are often referred to as passionate, knowledgeable, but also as irrational and bipolar, going from one extreme to the other. Ouch. But what is the definition of a “fan”? The word ‘fan’ is short for ‘fanatic’. There are a couple of definitions in dictionaries that make a whole lot of sense, particularly when put together:

1- a person who is extremely enthusiastic about and devoted to some interest or activity (Merriam-Webster)

2- : a person filled with excessive and single-minded zeal, especially for an extreme religious or political cause. (Oxford)

How many times have we heard Habs’ fans saying that hockey is not a sport, but a religion? Being in my fifth decade on this planet and having lived life’s experiences, it’s not something that I personally agree with but it would be futile on my part to think that there aren’t people seeing it that way. And that’s where things get complicated…

The need to be right

In today’s society, with the sense of entitlement this generation is living with, where everything is owed to them (or seems to be), there is a feeling that the “my way or the highway” is more predominant than ever. Too often, opinions are mistaken for facts. If one thinks or perceives things one way, then it must be factual, right? Not so much. Whatever happened to agreeing to disagree?

Pushing things even further is this need to be right… at all cost. People put themselves out there, have strong opinions, and they are so vocal and feel so strongly about them, that they reach the point of no return. If things don’t go as they said, as they claim, they must do anything and everything in their power to try to save face. They will accuse others, they will deny, they will find every other excuses in the books in order to justify thinking what they’re thinking, for saying what they’re saying, to ‘prove’ their point.

2015-02-28T01-57-54-9Z--1280x720.video_1067x600

Remember the famous blue and black, or white and gold dress debate? And unless you lived under a rock for the past month or so, how can we forget the ‘Yanni’ or ‘Laurel’ phenomenon? Is it remotely possible that two people can see things differently, and is it so hard for us to not only recognize it, but to accept it as well?

The Canadiens’ fan base doesn’t need me to point out situations where this applies, right? The controversy about every and any coach not named Scotty Bowman has the fan base divided. Whether it be Jacques Martin, Randy Cunneyworth (remember the language debate even for an interim coach?), Michel Therrien and even Stanley Cup winner Claude Julien, fans are divided on their decision-making and ultimately, on their capability as coaches.

It’s no different when it comes to General Managers… Réjean Houle, André Savard, Bob Gainey, Pierre Gauthier, and now Marc Bergevin have all been through the ringers by some of the Habs’ fan base, while more (or less) respected by others.

Players such as Mike Ribeiro, Saku Koivu, José Théodore, Patrice Brisebois, Alex Kovalev, David Desharnais, and now captain Max Pacioretty and even Carey Price are making the rounds amongst some of the fan base. Need I mention that guy in Nashville?

Social Media contribution

Like there are not enough topics for Habs’ fans to be divided about, the arrival of Social Media (particularly Twitter) has created a monster. Worse is the fact that it’s being fed greatly by some media members, some who, in my humble opinion, don’t deserve the title of journalists, who use their platform to spew their views, often strong dislikes borderline hater, instead of reporting the news. You know who they are. They are more prominent in print media and radio shows, but you find a few on television as well.

Social Media

Fans read, listen those opinions and because it suits what they think, it becomes their reality. With social media, they now have a voice, an immediate medium to channel their beliefs and one person agrees with the other and it quickly creates a ‘side’ on a topic. Think about it… someone posts a strong opinion and has hundreds, if not thousands of people instantaneously knowing about it. How do you back out and save face now? Plus if others, media member(s) include, think the way I do, then it must be true. It must be factual, right? No, it’s not.

Now you have narcissistic and egocentric individuals joining the bandwagon on both sides of the debate(s) and the name calling starts. The ‘Subanista’ and the ‘Bergevin lovers’, the ‘Weber fans’ vs the ‘Subban fans’, the ‘negative fans’ or the ‘rose glasses fans’… It’s either black or white (no pun intended), no room for grey area. Because you speak in favour of someone, you are being catalogued as a ‘lover’.

A perfect example of that is the racism card used against those who speak up against P.K. Subban… in the accusers’ mind, it must be it, as how could someone not think like me? Yes, it has gotten to that point! If you speak against someone or a behaviour, you are then  catalogued as a ‘hater’. Either way, you have lost all credibility with the ‘other side’ because you disagree on a topic.

While I know that this plea will not have any influence on the issue, it is one that needs to be done regardless. To both sides, it’s time to grow up and stop acting like children. NHL players, coaches, general managers and even water-boys and particularly owners don’t owe us anything. Stop with the entitlement. You want something? Go get it or ask for it. You want respect? EARN IT. Earn it by your actions. Be the bigger person and don’t get dragged into this non-sense. Don’t feed on the media members preying on you to get readership, listenership or viewership. They know exactly what they’re doing, they got you exactly where they want you. You are their sheep when you play into their hand. Have a mind of your own but mostly, mostly, respect the fact that not everyone thinks the same way as you do… and that’s perfectly okay. It’s something that even I have to keep reminding myself of and that, on a daily basis. Go Habs Go! 

 

Advertisements

Molson Opens Up on Roy, Bergevin, Subban and The Plan

MolsonMirror

A disappointing season, frustrated fans, blood-thirsty media… and no playoffs. This is not what Montreal Canadiens’ owner and team President Geoff Molson had envisaged facing in early April but that’s the reality that he’s been handed by a team that, let’s face it, has underperformed for one reason or another, or for a combination of reasons. Still, Molson faced the music alongside his right-hand man, General Manager Marc Bergevin, to answer questions and talk about the team’s future.

Many came out of the season’s end press conference feeling left on their appetite, with few questions answered and little “meat on the bone” to give them hope for next season’s on-ice product. From making a mockery of the talks about ‘attitude’ to Molson’s discussions about making the Bell Centre’s experience a more pleasant one, it seems like the focus was on the side dishes instead of on the main course, to stay within the food analogy.

Improved communication

The Canadiens’ brass has been under fire for not saying enough about every possible topics surrounding the team, whether it be about players’ injuries, the team’s direction or even rumours. Molson wants to improve on that aspect and he has made that clear more recently in an interview with Le Journal de Montréal earlier this week. He brought up an example of why fans should not take for granted everything that’s making its round on the internet.

“Instead of always trying to say the least possible, we will try to ask ourselves how say the maximum without impeding on the players and put them in danger. For example, some rumour that I had met with Patrick Roy recently was doing its round. I should have said it immediately. No, I did not meet Patrick Roy. Period.”

It is important to understand that a team will NEVER divulge critical, important and critical information. You will never hear the organisation commenting on topics that fans and/or media members really want to know, such as what’s happening in the dressing room or in players’ lives. They will never share which player(s) they are targeting in trades or sign as free agents. And rest assured that Bergevin and his team will continue to keep their cards close to their chest when it comes to those topics, as they should. But there are other areas, mostly after the fact, that might come to light, according to Molson.

“To get there, we will have to develop a new method of communication. We will have to develop new reflexes. It won’t be obvious to everyone, but I am committed. And we will win from it. When Marc traded Jarred Tinordi to the Arizona Coyotes, we got two players: defensemen Victor Bartley and John Scott. People were wondering why those two players? We should have explained to the fans that the second player was acquired because the Coyotes absolutely wanted to free up a salary. People would have understood.”

Acknowledging and understanding that ticket prices was a touchy topic on the mind of many of those attending the games or wishing to do so, he reassured fans that their concerns don’t fall on deaf ears. Already showing that he does mean to be more transparent on different issues, he did want to touch on the topic, mostly to shed some light for fans to see the reality.

“First of all, we are lucky to have 21,000 seats. It allows us to have very affordable tickets in the upper sections. I also want to point to something: when I arrived with the Canadiens, the average price at the Bell Centre was the third highest in the NHL. Today, we are eight or ninth. I’m very proud of that. And the ticket prices won’t go up next year. We are not following the tendency across the league.”

Bergevin is the man

BergevinTel
Marc Bergevin

While informing media and fans alike that everything and everyone will be evaluated in the next days or weeks coming up, Molson did confirm having done his evaluation of Bergevin and he has full confidence in his GM to turn things around. No, he didn’t do his evaluation in the 48 hours or so following the team’s last game as some fans insinuated, but it was rather an on-going evaluation, which is guaranteed not to please the crowd wishing for a rapid-firing. The team’s President restated what he’s been saying all along, which is that he is hands-on and communicates with his hockey man on a regular basis.

“I spend a lot of time understanding the work of our GM. I consult with Marc constantly. I’m aware of the negotiations with the players, I follow everything he does. And I bring some thoughts which are different from the GM’s. I think that it’s useful.”

The plan

A lot of the frustration after the press conference was coming from the fact that both Molson and Bergevin spoke of their plan in place to improve the team, without going into specifics. Being deprived on what they feel is key information, many fans and media members alike seem to think that there is no way of straightening the situation and because the organisation isn’t sharing that plan, that it means that they don’t have one, or at least not one that they would like. Yet, it can’t be further from the truth. As mentioned earlier, they will not, and in some cases cannot, divulge some important information. Whether it be because of the risk of tampering, risk to kill potential ongoing trade talks or informing the affected staff of their possible firing, the Habs’ brass simply has their hands tied on the topic. That’s the reality of the situation and it won’t change regardless of what people say or think.

“Yes, I know [the plan]. I know who could be released of their duties. But it’s impossible to predict if the plan is 100% executable, for many reasons. We don’t know who will become available on the hiring market after the first round of the playoffs. Usually, people are fired after an elimination. Then, there’s the draft. April 28th is the date of the NHL lottery for the draft. If we’re lucky, we are guessing that youngster Rasmus Dahlin would change things. We wouldn’t have to find someone to play on the left side with Shea Weber. Finally, there will be the free agents’ market on July 1st. We will be very active, but it remains an auction for the best talents. We do our best but ultimately, the player decides.”

It seems like Molson, with this answer, provided a lot of information and yet, no one seems to have paid attention to it in the media or in the Twitter world. It seems like regardless of the improvement and development of young defensemen like Victor Mete, Mike Reilly and Noah Juulsen, the organisation is looking for a left defenseman able to eat up key minutes to play alongside Weber. This augurs well as if the youngsters are relegated more to a depth position, it will be better for their development but mostly, for the team to be competitive, depending on who they might bring in, of course.

With this comment, Molson not only stated the obvious in that the team is planning on drafting Dahlin if he is available when their turn comes up, a no-brainer if you ask me, but that the draft ranking will have a lot to do with the on-ice decisions are concerned.

Bomb on Subban

As we have touched on the topic in many occasions on this blog, there are reasons why P.K. Subban has been traded. The controversy took another turn when he and Brendan Gallagher got into it earlier this season and due to the magnitude of the trade, and the “image” portrayed by Subban off ice and his flamboyant style of play, it is unfortunately not going to die any time soon. Molson, however, added key information to the in-house thought process by shocking those who blamed Bergevin for making that trade.

“The decision that we had to trade P.K. was taken months before the trade. We had to wait for the right occasion for the organisation. I thought about it for months. But not wanting to get into details, we had to make the change on the team. When Shea Weber became available, the reflexion was already done. And I think that most of the GM’s feel like we made an excellent trade even if P.K. is a big star.”

SubbanPreds
P.K. Subban

While those comments won’t do anything to turn around those who don’t like the trade, it certainly adds to the enigma and stigma that Subban had serious issues on the team and that he had to go, whether people want to admit to it or not. Perhaps it is an overused cliché, but saying that “the logo on the chest is more important than the number in the back of the jersey” certainly applies here, or so it seems considering all evidence. It wasn’t something new.

Further, Bergevin was asked by Michel Langevin on 91.9 Sports if, when looks back on the Subban trade, he has some regrets, any regrets. Langevin asked him the question three times, three different ways, and the GM’s answer remained the same:

“Not at all. I’m not taking anything away from P.K., that’s not it, but I went and got what I wanted, and I strongly believe in Shea Weber. Nashville has a good team, but I think that we all agree that if Shea Weber is with Nashville today, they also have a very good team… two very good defensemen changed teams.”

SheaWeberA
Shea Weber

People will call Bergevin a liar, particularly those who want him fired, but what’s a GM to say when asked a direct question to know if a player is on the market, if he wants to get maximum value? Yes, he is? If anyone should understand that position with star players, it should be Habs’ fans and media members, no? Are those people too young to remember the Patrick Roy trade, or Chris Chelios? Those stars were openly on the market and they didn’t get anywhere close to a player or players of the caliber of Weber in return. That’s why folks, such information is not shared publicly before the fact.

Some people will be satisfied with what was provided by the organisation so soon after the season, others won’t. Some will be called “apologists”, others “haters”. That’s very unfortunate because in most cases, it’s as far as it gets from being a fact. My only wish, and I know that it will never happen in day and age of social media where everyone is an expert, is that everyone would go back at cheering for the team we all say we love.

I will leave you folks with this amazingly quote from Israeli historian and multiple best selling author Yuval Noah Harari:

Censorship no longer works by hiding information from you; censorship works by flooding you with immense amounts of misinformation, of irrelevant information, of funny cat videos, until you’re just unable to focus.

So be careful what you believe on the internet, including what’s being spewed about your Canadiens and anyone in the organisation. Go Habs Go!