NHL 32 Teams Revamp

With the announcement that the National Hockey will finally welcome Seattle into its folds – a much overdue addition – the league will finally have two balanced Conferences with 16 teams in each one. The Seattle Metropolitans of the Pacific Coast Hockey Association won the Cup in 1917, beating the National Hockey Association’s Montreal Canadiens. The NHL was founded later that year. Time will tell if the ownership group will chose to build on the City’s hockey history or not but either way, it will generate excitement in the Pacific Northwest.

And with the expansion, what better time for the NHL to revamp and balance its schedule to make the league more equitable for everyone? Since the arrival of the Las Vegas Golden Knights, the odds of making the playoffs have been higher in the West than in the East, with one fewer team not making it to the Stanley Cup rounds. It’s also very difficult to balance a schedule with an uneven number of teams, let’s admit.

Regular Season

While I’m sure some NHL executives would go along with that plan, many others would be totally against it… for revenue purposes, but here is what I would personally love to see. So regardless of the naysayers, hear me out on this one.

First thing’s first: get rid of the divisions. Back in the days when you had 4-5 teams per division, there might have been some benefit of having divisions, in order to create some rivalries. But with eight teams per division, it’s not the case so much. Rivalries in today’s NHL are built in the playoffs. So you go with two Conferences, no divisions. So far so good?

Each team would play two (2) games against each team of the other Conference. One at home, one away, as they are currently doing. This allows for fans to get the opportunity to see each and every team in the league at least once. So two games against 16 teams would result in 32 games played.

On the current 82 games schedule format, this would leave 50 games to play within your own conference… but for any given team, there are 15 other teams in their Conference. It takes no mathematician to figure out that you 50 doesn’t divide equally by 15 so by keeping the number of games as it stands, it would create some complications.

If the NHL wanted teams to play 4 (4) games against each conference rivals (2 home, 2 away) it would total 60 games (4×15). Add the 32 against the other Conference and you have a 92 games schedule. That’s not going to happen. The season is already too long and the NHLPA would never go for that… and rightfully so.

Now if they play three (3) games against each team in their own Conference, it represents 45 games (3×15). Add the 32 extra-Conference games and you would have a 77 games schedule. Ideally, this a more feasible solution and it would allow room to squeeze in the World Cup and the Olympics, each one every alternating 4 years. This means that every two years, there would be an international tournament within the NHL season. The only imperfection is that teams would be playing two home games and one away, and vice-versa, against any given team within their Conference.

But wait… a 77 games schedule? That’s five games (82-77=5) where owners are losing revenue. They’re definitely not going to go for that, right? So in order to satisfy that revenue loss by the owners, what if we were to cut their biggest expense? What if we clawed back the players’ salaries and the salary cap by six percent (6%), which is the equivalent of 5 games over 82?


The NHL season is long and grueling. Why not make it mean something – or at least more than what it means under the current format – by rewarding the players for their hard work? The best teams in the regular season should have a clearly defined advantage and mostly, not be penalized for being in a tougher division! The playoffs’ format as it stands today makes no sense to both NHL teams and their fans. The playoffs should be sorted by Conference and the higher you finish in the standings, the weaker your opponent should be (on paper) based on the regular season.

Eastern Standings Feb.7/19

Not accounting for travel, the ideal format would be to ignore Conferences and go with the old 1 vs 16, 2 vs 15, 3 vs 14, etc, and allowing for a chance to see an Edmonton vs Calgary, Los Angeles vs Anaheim, Philadelphia vs Pittsburgh, Montreal vs Toronto Stanley Cup finals. But due to unfair travel time and costs, that’s not going to pass with neither the Board of Governors or the NHLPA. So the next best thing to do is to go with the overall Conference standings. First place in the Conference faces the eight place team, 2nd vs 7th, 3rd vs 6th, 4th vs 5th. For subsequent rounds, reseed the teams based on the regular season.

Shutout the shootout

Can we please finally get rid of this shootout gimmick?!? It should have never been there to start with. You don’t see the NFL decide games with quarterbacks throwing footballs through hoops, MLB with a homerun competition or the NBA with free throws. If teams are tied after 60 minutes, play five minutes at 4 on 4. If they are still tied, then play five minutes at 3 on 3. If still tied after 70 minutes, it’s a well deserved tie game by both teams.

I did some research in the BCHL a couple of years ago and over a period of six years, only 2% of all games ended in a tie game. I have attended games ending in a tie and with this format of OT, everyone was happy, including the fans. The OT is spectacular and extremely entertaining and that, even if you had the most boring first 60 minutes. Assuming the same ratio, this would mean 25 games in the NHL would result in a tie on an 82-game season.

Last but not least, lose the loser point. Winning team gets two (2) points, whether it’s in regulation or overtime. The losing team gets nothing, they have lost game! No room for consolation prize here, it’s professional sports. Now if teams are still tied after the second OT, the game ends in a tie and each team gets one (1) well deserved point.

The league has made some good choices, but some pretty bad ones too in recent years when it comes to the tradition of hockey, with the Instigator rule change being the biggest mistake. It’s time to give the game back to the fans, give them what THEY want. Afterall, we know that Gary Bettman will lockout the players again soon, as he’s done every time.


Habs Are Neither Buyers or Sellers

Ah this time of the NHL season. It’s like Christmas for hockey fans. Some teams are sellers, wanting to stock up on picks and prospects, while others are considered buyers, trying to improve their team for the immediate future in hope of either make a run at the elusive Stanley Cup or at the very least, earn a playoffs spot and a couple of home games for the owners to cut their losses or fill their pockets. Either way, fans and media members alike are anxious to see what their local team will do.

With five weeks to go to the February 25th trade deadline, teams are justleling and the race is tight in many places. The Atlantic division sees the Toronto Maple Leafs, Boston Bruins and Montreal Canadiens within a point of each other, battling for 2nd and 3rd in the division, and/or for a Wild Card spot at the very least. The Buffalo Sabres are four points from a playoffs spot too, but they have been trending the wrong way as of late.

The Metropolitan division has four teams within two points, with the Tavares-less New York Islanders overtaking the Columbus Blue Jackets and Stanley Cup champions Washington Capitals to lead the division, while the Pittsburgh Penguins (58 points) occupy the last Wild Card spot, two points back.

In the weaker Western Conference, you can dream of the playoffs if you find yourself around the .500 mark. You have Colorado, Dallas and Vancouver with 50 points, with Minnesota, Edmonton and Anaheim a single point back, while Arizona (46) and St. Louis (45) are still mathematically in the race. Only three of those teams will make the playoffs.

Habs neither buyers or sellers

If you pay attention to what Canadiens’ GM Marc Bergevin is saying, it is very unlikely that he will be pursuing short-term help. This means that he will not be a buyer. And why would he be? His team is one of the youngest in the league and it has performed beyond what most people thought they would this season.

“I’m always going to be listening to options, but the goal is to build for the future. Just to give up assets for the short-term, I’m not going to do it. It would have to be very appealing. If there are young players available, assets have to go. I get that. But, I don’t think I’ll be in the rental business.”

“Based on what I saw in Vancouver [at the WJC], the future of the Canadiens is very bright. I’m not going to start mortgaging the future. I know what’s coming with the World Juniors, who they’re going to be asking for, and I’m not moving these kids. It’s going to be a short conversation, I think… If we drafted these kids, it’s because we believe they have some potential. That came to the forefront in Vancouver with our prospects that really stepped up their games.”

~ Marc Bergevin (January 7, 2019)

Only Kenny Agostino, Jordie Benn and Antti Niemi are pending UFAs at the end of the season. With the Canadiens in a playoffs’ spot, don’t expect any of them to be traded as they are, in fact, some very good “rentals”.

If Bergevin makes a move, it will have to be a hockey trade, one that makes sense not only for now, but for the future. The Canadiens have just over $9 million of cap space available so it is not out of the realm of possibilities that teams might come knocking with offers like the one with the Winnipeg Jets, which saw them unload a contract in Steve Mason, bringing in Joel Armia into the Habs’ fold as a reward for doing so.

Joel Armia

The Canadiens’ biggest need right now still is a suitable partner for Shea Weber, someone who can eat up 25 quality minutes a game against the opposition’s top lines. Victor Mete is doing fairly well but if they want to be taken more seriously, they need an improvement at that position. While Alexander Romanov has made huge strides, he is likely a few years from having the necessary impact to play such a role. A while back, I had created a list of 24 potential target for Bergevin and while the list likely has changed somewhat, some names on that list would still be pretty good options.

It is also very much possible that Bergevin sits there and doesn’t do anything. If that happens, he will be criticised by some but rest assured, this would not be a bad move at all. The future is bright, very bright in Montreal and in spite of what some want you to believe, Bergevin knows what he’s doing. Go Habs Go!